Friday, November 2, 2007

AdMob Offers First Facebook Mobile Advertising Solution

Quoted from http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/admob-offers-first-facebook-mobile-advertising-solution/:

AdMob Offers First Facebook Mobile Advertising Solution

AdMob Offers First Facebook Mobile Advertising Solution

Duncan Riley

10 comments »

San Mateo based mobile advertising solutions provider AdMob has announced AdMob for Facebook Mobile, a mobile advertising solution for developers of third-party Facebook applications.

AdMob has enabled optimized mobile ads for Facebook Mobile, which developers can use to monetize their mobile applications. Developers can start showing ads and earning money immediately.

AdMob for Facebook Mobile is said to be the first monetization solution for Facebook Mobile developers. AdMob is now serving 1.5 billion ads a month, up from the 1 billion they were serving when we first wrote about them in August.

AdMob Investors include Sequoia and Accel Partners and management includes staff previously with eBay, YouTube and Google.

More Ad Network Deals—Specific Media Raises $100 Million, AOL Close to Buying Quigo For $300 Million

Quoted from http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/more-ad-network-deals%e2%80%94specific-media-raises-100-million-aol-close-to-buying-quigo-for-300-million/:

More Ad Network Deals—Specific Media Raises $100 Million, AOL Close to Buying Quigo For $300 Million

More Ad Network Deals—Specific Media Raises $100 Million, AOL Close to Buying Quigo For $300 Million

Erick Schonfeld

6 comments »

The frenzy around online ad networks never stops (maybe because there are so many of them). This morning, Specific Media, announced a whopping $100 million investment by private equity firm Francisco Partners. This follows a $10 million venture round last June led by Enterprise Partners. Specific Media is the fourth largest ad network in terms of audience reach, according to comScore (after Advertising.com, Yahoo, and ValueClick). The 130.7 million people it reached across the Web in September was just below the 133.5 million reached by publicly-traded ValueClick, which has a market capitalization of $2.6 billion.

On the (possible) acquisition front, ad-targeting network Quigo might be bought by AOL for $300 million, according to Kara Swisher. Quigo provides contextual ad-targeting for many media Websites, including ABCNews.com, CNNMoney.com, Forbes.com, and USAToday.com. This would certainly be in keeping with AOL’s strategy to build out its Platform-A advertising network, even as it takes steps to allow consumers to opt out of such targeting. Quigo won’t confirm the rumor. But it didn’t deny it either. I called up Quigo CEO Michael Yavonditte earlier today to ask him about it. His non-response: “There are rumors that we are going public, there are rumors that we are going to be bought. We don’t comment on stuff like that.” Sounds like he is keeping his options open.

(Disclosure: I am a former employee of Time Warner, which is the parent of both AOL and CNNMoney, and I own Time Warner stock.)

Specificmedia Website: http://specificmedia.com Location: Ir vine Founded: 1999 Total Funding: $110.00M Specific Media is the 4th largest ad network by audience reach according to comscore. It follows AOL's advertising.com, Yahoo and ValueClick. Learn more Quigo Website: http://quigo.com Location: New York Founded: 0000 Total Funding: $5.00M Quigo is an ad-targeting network that provides contextual advertising services for many large media websites including ABCNews.com, CNNMoney.com, Forbes.com, and USAToday.com. Quigo is a direct competitor to Google's contextual advertising program, Adsense. Quigo is rumored ... Learn more

 

Checkmate? MySpace, Bebo and SixApart To Join Google OpenSocial (confirmed)

Quoted from http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/confirmed-myspace-to-join-google-opensocial/:

Checkmate? MySpace, Bebo and SixApart To Join Google OpenSocial (confirmed)

Checkmate? MySpace, Bebo and SixApart To Join Google OpenSocial (confirmed)

Michael Arrington

163 comments »

Google may have just come out of nowhere and checkmated Facebook in the social networking power struggle.

MySpace and Six Apart will announce that they are joining Google’s OpenSocial initiative. Silicon Alley Insider reported the MySpace rumor earlier today. We’ve confirmed that from an independent source, as well as the fact that Six Apart is joining. Per the update below, Google has also confirmed Bebo is joining.

Google will be making an announcement today. MySpace and Six Apart join Orkut, Salesforce, LinkedIn, Ning, Hi5, Plaxo, Friendster, Viadeo and Oracle as announced Google partners. No word on whether MySpace will continue with efforts to complete its own recently announced platform, but the answer is probably yes. They are likely to simply do both (Update: see below).

Suddenly, within just the last couple of days, the entire social networking world has announced that they are ganging up to take on Facebook, and Google is their Quarterback in the big game.

Update (12:30 PST): On a press call with Google now. This was embargoed for 5:30 pm PST but they’ve moved the time up to 12:30 PST (now). Press release will go out later this evening. My notes:

On the call, Google CEO Eric Schmidt said “we’ve been working with MySpace for more than a year in secret on this” (likely corresponding to their advertising deal announced a year ago).

MySpace says their new platform efforts will be entirely focused on OpenSocial.

The press release names Engage.com, Friendster, hi5, Hyves, imeem, LinkedIn, Ning, Oracle, orkut, Plaxo, Salesforce.com, Six Apart, Tianji, Viadeo, and XING as current OpenSocial partners.

We’re seeing a Flixster application on MySpace now through the OpenSocial APIs. Flixster says it took them less than a day to create this. I’ll add screen shots below.

Here’s the big question - Will Facebook now be forced to join OpenSocial? Google says they are talking to “everyone.” This is a major strategic decision for Facebook, and they may have little choice but to join this coalition.

Bebo has also joined OpenSocial.

Google Back Link Update? Google Blog Search Link Command Slow?

Quoted from http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/015201.html:

Google Back Link Update? Google Blog Search Link Command Slow?

November 1, 2007

Google Back Link Update? Google Blog Search Link Command Slow?

A DigitalPoint Forums thread reports that Google has also done a backlink update recently.

Now, I think most people in this forum thread are talking about the link:www.domain.com command when searched at Google.com. That backlink command is known to just show a sampling on one's backlinks and no the full set of backlinks.

If that is the case and people are noticing a change (or increase) in the number of backlinks reported, then there is not much to those numbers. I personally would ignore such an update. What you do want to look at are your backlinks reported in Google Webmaster Tools and Yahoo Site Explorer.

There have been additional reports of Google Blog Search not return recent backlink counts for specific URL checks. For example, an article I wrote yesterday, shows 0 backlinks in Google Blog Search, click here to see. This appears to be a small, temporary issue in Google. I suspect it will be fixed shortly.

Forum discussion at DigitalPoint Forums.

10 Useless SEO Worries

Quoted from http://searchengineland.com/071101-085057.php:

10 Useless SEO Worries

Nov. 1, 2007 at 8:50am Eastern by Stoney deGeyter

10 Useless SEO Worries

I often feel sorry for small businesses. I do. Too often they don't have the funds, time, or resources to investigate things as thoroughly as they should. Unlike larger businesses with deep pockets, small business can't hire first-rate, high-end SEOs to do all the right things for them. All too often they have to rely on the free advice on blogs, forums, and social networking sites—and then do all the worrying themselves. If they are in a slightly better position, they might be able to pawn off some of that worry to an SEO which they have not fully vetted, and who may end up taking their campaign in the wrong direction. But that leaves them with entirely new things to worry about.

Spending nights worrying about an SEO campaign can eat up a lot of energy that the small business would be better off applying to other areas. But with so much information out there, it's hard to know what's what. The SEO industry tends to thrive on extremes. We create lists of things that absolutely mustbe done and lists of things that absolutely must not be done. But far too often, within either of those lists are things that simply don't matter at all. To provide a bit of middle ground to all the extremes, here are things that you simply do not need to spend more than a half a second fretting over:

10) Focusing on number one rankings

Are we still obsessed with getting #1 rankings? Number one rankings aren't all they are made out to be. This is especially true when dealing with broad, non-targeted phrases. Listen, top search engine placement is great, but there is so much more to obsess over. How about focusing on site conversions and usability? How about branding? How about improving your web site and services so you actually deserve that #1 position?

The thing we hear most often from small businesses is that being on top is the only way to drive traffic. That is so not true anymore, especially within the context of social media. There are so many more ways to drive traffic to a web site. Yes, search engines are one of those ways, but they are not the only way. And yes, the exposure you get from a top ranking is great and all, but the fact is that unless you truly deserve to be there (and this can be determined by as much of what happens offline as on), you're just not going to be able to displace a competitor that has been firmly established in that position, especially on competitive phrases.

So, no need to worry about that #1 ranking. Just get your site optimized and work on delivering targeted traffic to a high-converting web site. Focus on that and someday the #1 ranking may follow.

9) Obsessing over PageRank

You gotta love an industry that tells people they should ignore page rank but suddenly obsesses over it when Google does a number with their little green bar on high profile sites. But we all need to know why these things happen, right? Fair enough. It is important to know why certain things are happening so you can make sure you're not doing anything to violate the search engine guidelines. But after that, it's time to just let it go.

The fact is, tool bar PageRank isn't much of an accurate measure of anything. It's fine to consider in context, but really, does it matter if your site goes up or down a PR level? Is it worth the effort to move your site from a PR3 to a PR6? In a word: no.

PageRank is simply an effect, not a cause. Focusing on PageRank is useless. However, if you focus on creating a valuable site that others think is worth linking to and shopping at, then you'll see your little green bar grow bit by bit. People don't convert or not convert based on PageRank. They do based on the quality of the site.

And while we're at it, let's talk about "leaking" PageRank. Listen, of all things to worry about, PageRank leakage isn't one of them. If you want to link out to sites that you feel are valuable to your visitors, then do it. If you're linking for the sake of linking, then don't. It's a simple as that.

8) Worrying about who is linking to you

This one isn't a complete throwaway, because you should pay attention to your incoming links. But for the most part, there isn't a whole lot you can do about who does or doesn't link to you outside of implementing a reciprocal link campaign. And for the most part, who's linking to you is not going to hurt you. But there are some exceptions, so again, do keep an eye on these things from time to time but don't obsess over them.

If you find sites linking to you that you don't want to be associated with, the best you can do is to politely ask them to remove the link. If they are a spammer, chances are you'll never get a response. But sometimes you might, and you might even succeed at getting a link you don't like removed. But it's rare that that happens. And search engines understand this and act accordingly.

7) Worrying about what anybody else says (including me)

SEO opinions are like elbows—everybody has at least two, and each is on the opposite side of the issue! (I refrained from using the analogy about everybody's opinions stinking. You're welcome.) Seriously, you can't spend your time worrying about what SEO experts say and who contradicts them. Or about who's right and who's wrong. I'm not saying that you shouldn't read any information on the various sites frequented by the SEO community. I'm just saying take it all with a grain of salt. If you find someone that you tend to agree with based on your own experience, then go ahead and put a bit more stock into what that person says. But don't take it as gospel truth and always be open to different schools of thought.

Remember, experience is the best teacher. And I mean your experience, not only someone else's. You can only gain knowledge from others, but you can never know what actually works or doesn't work until you go out and do it for yourself.

6) Obsessing over Microsoft/Yahoo/Ask rankings

Before you get your panties in a bunch over this one, let me put it into context. Each engine has different algorithms and therefore each will rank a page differently for the same keywords. Is it smart to work on getting your site ranked on MSN, Yahoo, and Ask? Sure, absolutely. But never at the expense of your Google rankings. Never. While different algorithms are employed, they all tend to run off the same basic premise: a good site will rank well, regardless of the algorithm used to evaluate it.

Don't think that you need to optimize a page for each search engine. It doesn't work that way. Just do good optimization and all engines will rate you accordingly. Now, you should be concerned about making sure each engine finds your web site and that it is relevant for your key search phrases. But don't make drastic changes to your pages because Ask or Microsoft has you at page 2 while Google has you at the top of page 1. Not unless you absolutely know those changes won't cause a drop in your Google rankings. If you're uncertain, or if you make those changes and see Ask move up and Google move down, by all means change it back. It's just not worth it.

I'll finish up next week (you can thank me with lavish praise and links.) We'll keep going down the list until we hit the number one thing that a small business should absolutely never be worried about. Ever. Stay tuned.

Stoney deGeyter is CEO of Pole Position Marketing. The Small Is Beautiful column appears on Thursdays at Search Engine Land.

Thursday, November 1, 2007

CO-ED Magazine » Facebook Music is Coming!

Quoted from http://coedmagazine.com/entertainment/Music/3400:

CO-ED Magazine » Facebook Music is Coming!

Facebook Music is Coming!

October 31, 2007 – 12:35 pm, By Steve - Seton Hall University

 

As reported earlier this year, Facebook has been rumored to announce an online music service to compete with iTunes and MySpace in the near future.

This just in: the “Facebook Music” platform will serve as the social networking giants first step into the music space.

The new platform is set to be announced at ad:tech in New York City next week. Leading up to this announcement Facebook has been holding top-secret meetings with high-level representatives at each of the four major music labels.

Here’s how it works:

Major and independent label artists and will register their sub-domain name through Facebook. Like “www.facebook.com/insertbandnamehere” for example.

On this page Facebook users will be allowed to become “fans” of the artist and connect to the media hosted on the “artist page.”

In the first generation of Facebook Music “fans” will be allowed to listen to artist’s music, watch videos, upload pictures, add music to their page, receive tour information and interact with other fans. Online music moguls, be warned.

Future generations will come quickly and allow unprecedented targeted marketing, ad buys and media promotion. Facebook is developing artist specific sales widgets to allow for music sales through the site as well.

This is only the first generation of Facebook Music and Zuckerberg has stated that users can expect future developments that include a head-on assault on iTunes and MTV, possible intergration with the iLike application and the ultimate goal being to consume MySpace Music - Tom Anderson’s bread and butter.

Google Announces the OpenSocial API

Quoted from http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/10/google-opensocial-api-launch.html:

Google Announces the OpenSocial API

Google Announces the OpenSocial API

 

Google has announced OpenSocial, a new open API for social networks. The new standard will allow developers to create Facebook-like apps on any social network site that implements it with the same calls.

The open API will have three parts

 

  • People
  • Storage
  • Activity stream

All of these calls will have a GData counterpart and they will use HTML and Javascript only. Google is considering adding OAuth (Radar post) to the API.

On Thursday the following links should go live:

 

Google's launch partners are hi5, iLike, Slide, LinkedIn, Plaxo, Ning and SixApart (the largest). Check out Techmeme, Techcrunch, and the New York Times for more coverage.

Google will be holding the first of their developer CampFires at the GooglePlex this Friday to explain OpenSocial. A CampFire is Google's new method of disseminating information to developers. These events will be invite-only and will include about thirty developers. Video of the event will be available in the days following.

Google's OpenSocial API will gain traction with a lot of social networks, but I doubt that we will see Facebook or MySpace supporting it. Both are large enough to require their own API. I'll be curious to see how each site extends the OpenSocial API and how that affects adoption and app creation.

Patrick Chanezon, a Google evangelist, will be giving a technical talk on the OpenSocial API Tuesday, November 6th (next week) at the Web 2.0 Expo Berlin.